IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PARVINDER MALIK @ DABBU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (201) Date of Decisio n : 29.01.2025
1. CRA-S-1770-2024 (O&M)
Harpal Singh @ Lillu …Appellant Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents
2. CRA-S-1209-2024 (O&M)
Parvinder Malik @ Dabbu …Appellant Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents
3. CRA-S-1487-2024 Nitesh Kumar @ Nitu …Appellant Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents
4. CRA-S-2970-2024 Daman Arora …Appellant Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Sandeep Saini, Advocate for the appellant in CRA-S-1209-2024.
Mr. J.S. Brar, Advocate for the appellant in CRA-S-1770-2024.
Mr. Aman Pal, Advocate Mr. Rajender Kumar, Advocate and Ms. Sweta Beniwal, Advocate for the appellant in CRA-S-1487-2024.
Mr. Dinesh Sharma, Advocate for Ms. Veena Hooda, Advocate for the appellant in CRA-S-2970-2024.
Mr. Pankaj Mulwani, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Namit Khurana, Advocate and Mr. Parth Aneja, Advocate for respondent No.2/complainant in all the cases.
****
KULDEEP TIWARI, J.
CRM-19397-2024 in CRA-S-1770-2024 For the good and valid reasons assigned in the application, the delay of 406 days in filing the appeal, is condon
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.