SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8316

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision:-30.01.2025 Manjinder Singh Dhaliwal ... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present:- Mr.A.S. Brar Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Puru Jarewal, AAG, Punjab.

Mr.Vinay Kumar Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2.

****

SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL)

1. At the outset, counsel for the petitioner submits that although he has mentioned that this is the first petition, but in fact it is the second petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of post-arrest bail in:-

FIR Dated Police Station Sections No.

53 25.07.2021 Ajitwal, District 304-B, 34 IPC (Section Moga 315 IPC was added later on)

2. Case of the prosecution is that FIR, Annexure P1, has been registered on the statement of Sewak Singh, father-in-law of the petitioner on the allegation that his daughter Ramandeep Kaur was married to the petitioner on 01.12.2019. A huge amount was spent on the wedding, but her mother-in-law, Manjit Kaur, was not satisfied and kept on harassing her. When his daughter came to her paternal home, she confided in the complainant but he prevailed upon her and sent her back. Allegation

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top