139 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : 30.01.2025 Ashok Gupta and others ...Petitioners Vs.

Raj Kumari @ Rajbala and others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present: Ms. Vibhu Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Namit Khurana, Advocate Mr. Satpal Bhasin, Advocate for respondent No.1 & 3.

Ms. Veena Hooda, Advocate for respondent No.4.

***

ANIL KSHETARPAL , J. (Oral)

1. Through this revision petition, the petitioner (defendant) assails the correctness of the trial Court’s order dated 15.05.2024 while dismissing his application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure to reject the plaint at the threshold.

2. A suit for specific performance of the agreement to sell was filed by Ashok Gupta against Subhash, Ramesh, Raj Kumari @ Rajbala (plaintiff) and Meena Kumari. Ramesh, Raj Kumari @ Rajbala and Meena Kumari were impleaded through general power of attorney of Subhash s/o Sh Dharam Singh. During the pendency of the suit, Subhash on the basis of attorney entered into the settlement before the Lok Adalat, which resulted in passing of decree by the Civil Court on 08.12.2018. Subsequently, Raj Kumari @ Rajbala