Sureshwar Thakur, J. (Oral)

1. The writ petitioner prays for the quashing of the rejection order Annexure P-7, wherebys the petitioner’s representation against the rejection of his technical bid became rejected. At the very outset, the subject works are at a nascent stage, inasmuch as, though the subject works stand awarded to the successful bidders, but the services asked to be performed by the successful bidders have not yet commenced.

2. The above nascent stage of the works allotted to the successful bidders, is of grave importance, inasmuch as, it may ultimately effectively sway this Court to the extent, that in case this Court is convinced that the disqualification entailed upon the petitioner’s technical bid, thus was ill made disqualification, therebys, this Court may be further led to after quashing the allotment of works to the successful bidders, to make a mandamus upon the respondents to re-float fresh invitations to offer.

3. The learned counsel for the writ petitioner becomes aggrieved from the requisite tender condition embodied in clause 14(IV) of the tender form conditions, conditions whereof becomes extracted hereinafter:-

“IV. MSEs must indicate their registration num