IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 13.01.2025 Pronounced on: 30.01.2025 Rajesh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Vikas Gulia, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Naveen K. Sheoran, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Ashwani Gaur, Advocate for the complainant.
****
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections
342 21.10.2020 Murthal, District Sonipat 120-B, 190, 328, 342, 355, 387, 506 IPC
1. The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking anticipatory bail.
2. In paragraph 12 of the bail petition, the accused declares that he has no criminal antecedents.
3. The facts and allegations are being taken from the reply filed by the State, which reads as follows:
“2. That the instant FIR came into being on the basis of complaint made by complainant Haripal Son of Rajender Singh, stated that I am resident of Village Machrola, Police Station Murthal, District Sonipat and doing the work of Property dealer in Sonipat City. That I know Rajesh @ Kala Resident of Village Lath and Surender s/o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.