IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ANIL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 09.01.2025 Pronounced on: 30.01. 2025 Anil Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Argued by: Mr. Kartar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Akshay Kumar, AAG, Punjab.
****
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections
113 14.06.2023 Lehra, Distrcit Sangrur 22/29/61/85 of the NDPS Act
1. The petitioner incarcerated in the FIR captioned above had come up before this Court under Section 439 Cr.P.C, seeking regular bail.
2. Par paragraph 12 of the bail application and reply dated 08.01.2025, the accused has the following criminal antecedents:
Sr. No. FIR Dated Sections Police Station No.
1. 69 25.09.2023 22 (C), 29 of the Sadar Rampura, District NDPS Act Bathinda
2. 21 13.04.2023 22, 29 of the NDPS Khanauri Act
3. The facts and allegations are taken from the reply filed by the State. On June 14, 2023, based on secret information, the Police seized 38 bottles of cough syrup (100 ml each) and 250 tablets from the joint possession of Birbal Singh and Shavinderpal Singh. The Investigator claims to have complied with all the statutory requirements of the NDPS Act,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.