210 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-16451-CWP-2019 in/and CWP-17461-2012 (O&M)

Date of Decision: 30.01.2025 HOME SECRETARY-CUM-SECRETARY TECHNICAL EDUCATION CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION . . . . Petitioner Vs.

S.S. BHATTI AND OTHERS . . . . Respondents ****

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA ****

Present: Ms. Shubreet Kaur, Advocate, Jr. Panel Counsel for Ms. Madhu Dayal, Advocate, Addl. Standing Counsel for the petitioner.

Mr. Rishav Sharma, Advocate For respondent No.1.

Mr. Ashish Rawal, Advocate for respondent No.2.

****

SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)

1. This is an old case pertaining to the year 2012. Main case is taken on board today itself.

2. The short point involved in the present case is whether the respondent No.1, who was admittedly appointed as a Principal of Chandigarh College of Architecture, Chandigarh on 01.04.1982 and was thereafter placed on regular basis vide order dated 21.01.1988, is entitled for the pay scale as admissible to the Principal of the College. The application filed by the respondent No.1 claiming the said salary has been allowed by the CAT with directions as under:

“17. The O.A. sh