SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
BHOLA – Appellant
Versus
HY.ST. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA-S-77-SB-1999 Reserved on: 16.01.2025.

Pronounced on: 30.01.2025 Bhola @ Ram Dass ...Appellant Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CRA-S-1747-SB-2005 Jarnail Singh @ Jaila …..Appellant Versus State of Punjab …..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Deepanshu Kapur, Advocate for Mr. S.S. Rana, Advocate for the appellant in CRA-S-1747-SB-2005.

None for the appellant in CRA-S-77-SB-1999.

Mr. Aashish Bishnoi, D.A.G., Haryana and Ms. Trishanjali Sharma, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Jasjit Singh, DAG, Punjab and Mr. Sukhdev Singh, A.A.G, Punjab.

Mr. Manish Bansal, P.P., U.T., Chandigarh along with Mr. Rajiv Vij, APP for U.T., Chandigarh.

****

ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

1. A common question of law is involved in all these appeals; as such, they are being decided together through a common judgment of the same date. Facts are extracted from CRA-S-77-SB-1999.

2. The convicts filed these appeals to challenge their convictions and sentences. Through separate orders, the appeals were admitted, the sentences were suspended, and the payment of the fines was stayed. Before the appeals came up for final hearing, in the interregnum, the appel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top