SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 28

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
(O&M) MAHI PAL AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
SANDEEP KUMAR AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : 04.02.2025 MAHI PAL AND OTHERS ... APPELLANTS VERSUS SANDEEP KUMAR AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present:- Mr. Wazir Singh, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Amrainder Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2.

Mr. D.P. Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.3.

***

Pankaj Jain, J. (Oral)

1. The present appeal is at the behest of the claimants aggrieved of the judgment passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Karnal dated 11.01.2012 whereby the claim petition filed by the claimants seeking compensation on account of death of Ashok Kumar in a motor vehicular accident, stands dismissed.

2. The claimants filed claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. As per the case of the claimants, claimant No.1, who was riding motorcycle driven by the deceased, when they were struck by a maruti car bearing registration No.PB-39-A-0605. The deceased Ashok Kumar sustained multiple injuries and later succumbed to death. FIR No.347 dated

29.06.2009 came into being for offence punishable under Sections 279 and 304-A IPC on the statement made by Mahi Pal. Respondents contested the claim

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top