SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 10493

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: February 06, 2025 Manoj Kumar ….Appellant versus Pooja ….Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER Present:- Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate for the appellant.

*****

SUDHIR SINGH, J. (ORAL)

CM-1584-CII-2025 For the reasons stated in application, same is allowed. Delay of 6 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

Main case (O&M)

Challenge in the present appeal is to the order dated 03.09.2024 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Chandigarh (for short the ‘the Family Court’), whereby, an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short ‘the Act’) filed by the respondent/wife, has been disposed of and the appellant/husband has been directed to pay maintenance pendente lite to the tune of Rs.10,000/- per month to the respondent/wife from the date of filing of the application, besides Rs.25,000/-

as litigation expenses.

2. In a petition under Section 13 of the Act, filed by the appellant/husband, the respondent/wife had filed the aforesaid application, inter alia, averring therein that she had no source of income and was completely dependent upon the appella

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top