SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 104

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
TEJ RAM & ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 22.01.2025 Pronounced on: 07.02.2025 TEJ RAM AND ANOTHER .....Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Argued by: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate Ms. Gitanjali, Advocate Mr. Rohan Moudgil, Advocate Mr. Jaspreet Singh, Advocate and Mr. Deepak Mishra, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana Mr. P.P.Chahar, Sr. Deputy Advocate General, Haryana and Mr. Saurabh Mago, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.

Mr. Pravindra Singh Chauhan, Advocate with Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate Ms. Kushaldeep Kaur Manchanda, Advocate and Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate for respondents-HSVP.

****

SURESHWAR THAKUR , J.

1. In the instant case, a notification was issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act of 1894'), was issued on 31.12.2013. The said notification was challenged by the petitioner through theirs instituting the instant writ petition. The instant petition came up for hearing before this Court, on 18.08.2015. On the said date, this Court ordered the parties to m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top