SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8693

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUMIT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 10.02.2025 Sumit ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SHEKHAWAT Present : Mr. Kuldeep Singh Wiwach, Advocate for Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Sheenu Sura, DAG, Haryana.

N.S.SHEKHAWAT , J. (Oral)

1. The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Section 483 of the BNSS with a prayer to grant a regular bail in case FIR No.359 dated 20.07.2023 registered under Sections 21, 22, 29 and 18-C of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, 'the NDPS Act') at Police Station Parao, District Ambala.

2. As per the case of the prosecution, the complainant alongwith other police officials had set up a Naka in search of wanted criminals and drug peddlers and in the meantime, a secret informer informed that the petitioner, who was in the business of supplying the intoxicating injections was coming to that side with a huge quantity of intoxicating injections. Consequently, the police had set up a Naka and the petitioner was arrested after following due process of law.

Even, 50 injections of Buprenorphine of 2 ML each and 100 injecti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top