IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUMIT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 10.02.2025 Sumit ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SHEKHAWAT Present : Mr. Kuldeep Singh Wiwach, Advocate for Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Sheenu Sura, DAG, Haryana.
N.S.SHEKHAWAT , J. (Oral)
1. The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Section 483 of the BNSS with a prayer to grant a regular bail in case FIR No.359 dated 20.07.2023 registered under Sections 21, 22, 29 and 18-C of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, 'the NDPS Act') at Police Station Parao, District Ambala.
2. As per the case of the prosecution, the complainant alongwith other police officials had set up a Naka in search of wanted criminals and drug peddlers and in the meantime, a secret informer informed that the petitioner, who was in the business of supplying the intoxicating injections was coming to that side with a huge quantity of intoxicating injections. Consequently, the police had set up a Naka and the petitioner was arrested after following due process of law.
Even, 50 injections of Buprenorphine of 2 ML each and 100 injecti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.