IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (319)

CR-265-2019 (O&M)

Date of decision: - 10.02.2025 Tarsem Lal ....Petitioner Versus Satish Kumar .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocate, and Mr. Kanishk Jindal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. M.L. Saggar, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Armaan Saggar, Advocate, and Mr. N.K. Manchanda, Advocate for the respondent.

****

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

1. Challenge in the present revision petition is to the judgment dated 26.11.2018 vide which the 1^st Appellate Court had allowed the appeal filed by the respondent-landlord and had directed the petitioner to vacate the premises in question within a period of two months.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner during the course of arguments, has submitted that the petitioner would withdraw the present revision petition but has sought time to vacate the premises and to shift to another premises. It has been stated that the petitioner is a tenant in the premises since 1982.

3. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present revision petiti