IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SHIV KUMAR AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
213 CWP-38197-2018 (O&M)
Date of decision: 11.02.2025 Shiv Kumar and another ...Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...Respondents
219 CWP-7179-2021 (O&M)
Date of decision: 11.02.2025 Shiv Kumar and another ...Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Chanderhas Yadav, Advocate and Mr. Harjit Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Tapan Kumar, DAG Haryana.
Mr. Vivek Saini, Advocate for respondent No.2-MICADA in CWP-7179-2021.
*****
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)
1. Whether State should be permitted to replace a set of contractual employees by another by way of a clandestine transfer of the scheme to another nodal instrumentality of the State, with a re-naming of the department, and thereby stopping the budgetary allocation to the department in which the petitioners were contractually engaged, and then to plead that since the State funding to the scheme is discontinued, the petitioners need to be relieved, is the core issue that arises for adjudication in these writ petitions. The same are thus taken up together.
2. Certain undisputed facts necessary
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.