SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 133

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KULWANT SINGH AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
MOHINDRO @ MOHINDER KAUR (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (111)

CR-5869-2019 Date of Decision: - 11.02.2025 Kulwant Singh and others ....Petitioners Versus Mohindro @ Mohinder Kaur (deceased) through LRs and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Mr. Aakash Singla, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Vikas Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

****

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

1. Present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 17.08.2019 (Annexure P-3) passed by the Additional District Judge, Tarn Taran, vide which the application for leading additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC of the plaintiff/respondent No.1 has been allowed. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has submitted that at any rate, the impugned order deserves to be set aside on the short ground that the application under Order 41 Rule 27 and Section 151 CPC filed by the respondent No.1 has been allowed prior to deciding the main appeal. It is further submitted that it has repeatedly been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and by this Court that the application under Order

41 Rule 27 CPC has to be de

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top