SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 110

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CHHINDER KAUR – Appellant
Versus
TARSEM LAL – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 12.11.2024 Pronounced on: 11.02.2025 Chhinder Kaur ……Appellant Versus Tarsem Lal ……Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN ****

Present: Mr. Achin Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. S.K. Bololia, Advocate for the respondent.

****

ALOK JAIN, J.

1. The present appeal arises out the judgment and decree dated 17.02.2017 passed by the Court below decreeing the suit of the plaintiff (respondent in the present appeal) for recovery of Rs. 1,86,656/- and also for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from alienating any portion of land as detailed in the head note of the plaint And the judgment and decree dated 28.11.2017 passed by the learned First Appellate Court whereby his appeal against the order dated 17.02.2017 was dismissed.

2. Succinctly, the facts of the case are that the suit was instituted at the instance of the respondent/plaintiff raising a claim that he is a Commission Agent operating in the New Grain Market, Faridkot, maintains duly recorded account books. The appellant/defendant took loan of ₹70,000 from respondent/plaintiff on various dates and duly acknowledged the debt by signing the appel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top