IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 31.01.2025 Date of decision: 11.02.2025 HUKAM CHAND (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS.

..Appellant Versus M.C. BATHINDA ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present: Mr. M.L. Sarin, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Hemani Sarin, Advocate for the appellant.

Ms. Kavita Arora, Advocate for respondent.

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

1. This regular second appeal has been filed challenging the correctness of concurrent findings of fact arrived at by the Courts below while dismissing appellant’s suit for grant of decree of permanent injunction.

2. In order to comprehend the issues involved in the present case, the relevant facts, in brief, are required to be noticed.

3. The appellant (plaintiff before the trial Court) sought decree of permanent injunction on the ground that he is the owner of the plot in question by virtue of sale deed executed by Sh. Babu Ram on 22.02.1973, on which he has constructed a factory building for installing Atta Chakki (flour mill), ‘Dal’ plant and oil expeller. The defendant-Municipal committee contested the suit while alleging that the plaintiff illegally and without permission has constructed a shed and bound