IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-8077-2025 Date of Decision:-13.02.2025 HARISH GARG ... PETITIONER VERSUS SUNIL GUPTA ... RESPONDENT CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY. Present:- Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate for the petitioner.

*****

SANJIV BERRY, J.(ORAL)

The instant petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing of the impugned order dated 15.01.2025 (Annexure P-4) passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Panchkula, in CRA No. 08 of 2025 titled as ‘Harish Garg Versus Sunil Gupta’, which is preferred by the petitioner against the judgment of conviction (Annexure P-2) dated 04.12.2024 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Panchkula, in NACT No.769 dated 19.07.2017 titled ‘Sunil Gupta Versus Harish Garg’, filed by the respondent under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, vide which, while deciding the application for suspension of sentence, the petitioner was directed to deposit 20% of the compensation amount within one month as a condition for suspension of sentence.

2. As per the learned counsel for the petitioner, the impugned order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Panchkula,