(cid:12)(cid:13)(cid:11)(cid:14)(cid:15)(cid:16)(cid:11)(cid:15)(cid:12)(cid:17)(cid:15)(cid:11)(cid:1)(cid:18)(cid:19)(cid:2)(cid:14)(cid:11)(cid:18)(cid:20)(cid:11)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:13)(cid:22)(cid:3)(cid:8)(cid:11)(cid:3)(cid:13)(cid:5)(cid:11)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:2)(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:13)(cid:3)(cid:11)(cid:3)(cid:14)

(cid:1)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:13)(cid:5)(cid:12)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:2)(cid:15)

(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:4)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:8)(cid:4)(cid:9)(cid:10)(cid:10)(cid:6)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)

(cid:5)(cid:24)ti(cid:26)(cid:11)(cid:27)(cid:28)(cid:11)(cid:5)(cid:26)(cid:29)(cid:30)(cid:31)(cid:30)(cid:27) !(cid:11)(cid:9)(cid:10)"(cid:10)(cid:9)"(cid:9)(cid:10)(cid:9)(cid:6)

#(cid:19)(cid:2)(cid:16)(cid:13)(cid:5)(cid:16)(cid:2)(cid:11)$(cid:19)%(cid:3)(cid:2)(cid:11)&(cid:11)(cid:18)(cid:14)(cid:15)(cid:16)(cid:2)#(cid:11)

.""(cid:11)(cid:3)’’(cid:26)(((cid:24) ti(cid:31)

)(cid:26)*(cid:31)+(cid:31)

#(cid:14)(cid:3)(cid:14)(cid:16)(cid:11)(cid:18)(cid:20)(cid:11)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:2)(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:13)(cid:3)

"""(cid:2)(cid:26)(cid:31)’(cid:27) ,(cid:26) ti

(cid:1)(cid:18)(cid:2)(cid:3)%!(cid:11) (cid:15)(cid:18)(cid:13)-(cid:8).(cid:16)(cid:11)%(cid:2)"(cid:11)(cid:22)(cid:19)#(cid:14)(cid:12)(cid:1)(cid:16)(cid:11)(cid:17)(cid:19)(cid:2))(cid:12)(cid:13)(cid:5)(cid:16)(cid:2)(cid:11)#(cid:12)(cid:13)(cid:17)(cid:15)(cid:11)(cid:17)(cid:12)..

(cid:15)(cid:18)(cid:13)/(cid:8).(cid:16)(cid:11)%(cid:2)"(cid:11)(cid:22)(cid:19)#(cid:14)(cid:12)(cid:1)(cid:16)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:22)(cid:3)#(cid:22)(cid:12)(cid:14)(cid:11)#(cid:12)(cid:13)(cid:17)(cid:15)(cid:11)(cid:8)(cid:16)(cid:5)(cid:12)

Present: Mr. APS Mann, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. R.S. Arya, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

****

(cid:22)(cid:3)#(cid:22)(cid:12)(cid:14)(cid:11)#(cid:12)(cid:13)(cid:17)(cid:15)(cid:11)(cid:8)(cid:16)(cid:5)(cid:12)0(cid:11)(cid:22)"

The present appeal has been filed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 08/11.01.2005 passed by the Addl.

Sessions Judge, Narnaul.

2. The FIR was registered on 22.05.2002, the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the Additional Session Judge, Narnaul is dated 08/11.01.2005, the appeal was filed on 24.01.2005 and the matter is being taken up for hearing now i.e. after a period of more than 22 ½ years from the date of registration of the FIR.

3. Briefly, the case of the prosecution was that on 22.05.2002 Laxmi Narain SI/SHO of Police Station Kanina received a telephonic message from CHC Kanina regarding the admission of injured Sunda Ram in a serious condition. He along with other police officials then rushed to CHC Kanina. When he reached in CHC Kanina, Sunda Ram had died. Kabool Singh was present and his statement was recorded, who alleged that 22.05.2002 he was returning to his house on his tractor on at about 4.30 P.M. and when he reached in front of the house of Ram Narain, his father also reached there who was taking the buffaloes towards the village Pond. In order to save the buffaloes, Kabool Singh took his tractor towards the house of Ram Narain as a result of which, the tractor drove over the stones outside the house of Ram Narain. It enraged the accused who were standing outside their house. They started abusing Kabool Singh in filthy language. However, Surajbhan father of Kabool Singh intervened and asked them not to abuse each other and he sent Kabool Singh to his house. When Kabool Singh reached his house, Sunda Ram, his uncle made an enquiry from him regarding the said Incident. Kabool Singh narrated the incident. On this, Sunda Ram asked Kabool Singh not to feel disturbed over this matter and he also assured him that he would go to the house of Ram Narain and would ask the accused not to behave in such a manner in future. Thereafter, Sunda Ram started for the house of Ram Narain. Kabool Singh and Sudesh followed him apprehending some mishappening. When Sunda Ram reached in front of the house of Ram Narain, all the accused armed wi