(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:3)(cid:5)(cid:1)(cid:7)(cid:5)(cid:3)(cid:8)(cid:9)(cid:10)(cid:11)(cid:4)(cid:3)(cid:9)(cid:12)(cid:3)(cid:13)(cid:10)(cid:2)(cid:14)(cid:15)(cid:16)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:5)(cid:15)(cid:11)(cid:18)(cid:15)(cid:2)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:15)(cid:4)(cid:3)

(cid:8)(cid:5)(cid:15)(cid:2)(cid:19)(cid:1)(cid:7)(cid:15)(cid:11)(cid:5).

(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:21)(cid:22)(cid:3)(cid:23)(cid:24)(cid:3)(cid:19)(cid:22)ti(cid:26)(cid:27)(cid:26)(cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:29)(cid:30)(cid:31) ! (cid:31)!(cid:31) (cid:31)"

(cid:8)(cid:11)(cid:15)(cid:30)#(cid:30)$%""(cid:30)#(cid:16)(cid:30)(cid:31) &’(cid:9)(cid:17)()(cid:3)

*(cid:26)(cid:27)+(cid:23),(cid:22)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:15)(cid:28),.

......Appellants.

Vs.

#(cid:21)(cid:20)(cid:21)(cid:22)(cid:3)(cid:23)(cid:24)(cid:3)(cid:5)(cid:20),-(cid:20)(cid:28)(cid:20).

......Respondent.

2.

(cid:8)(cid:11)(cid:15)(cid:30)#(cid:30)$./0(cid:30)#(cid:16)(cid:30)(cid:31) &’(cid:9)(cid:17)()(cid:3)

1(cid:26)(cid:28)(cid:23)2.

......Appellant.

Vs.

#(cid:21)(cid:20)(cid:21)(cid:22)(cid:3)(cid:23)(cid:24)(cid:3)(cid:5)(cid:20),-(cid:20)(cid:28)(cid:20).

......Respondent.

(cid:8)(cid:9)(cid:11)(cid:15)((cid:29)(cid:30)(cid:3) (cid:5)(cid:9)(cid:2)3(cid:16)4(cid:6)(cid:3)((cid:11)!(cid:3)(cid:14)(cid:10)#(cid:4)(cid:1)(cid:8)(cid:6)(cid:3)(cid:14)(cid:15)#(cid:14)(cid:1)(cid:4)(cid:3)#(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:7)(cid:5)(cid:3)(cid:16)(cid:6)(cid:19)(cid:1)(cid:3)

Present:(cid:19) Mr. Ajit Sihag, Advocate for the appellant no.1(cid:19)Kishore (in CRA(cid:19)S(cid:19)1655(cid:19)SB(cid:19)2008).

Mr. Prashant Sethi, Advocate for the appellant no.2(cid:19)Rajesh @

Nanar (in CRA(cid:19)S(cid:19)1655(cid:19)SB(cid:19)2008).

Ms. Shubhreet Kaur, Advocate, Amicus Curiae for the appellant (in CRA(cid:19)S(cid:19)1394(cid:19)SB(cid:19)2008).

Mr. Viney Phogat, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.

***

(cid:14)(cid:15)#(cid:14)(cid:1)(cid:4)(cid:3)#(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:7)(cid:5)(cid:3)(cid:16)(cid:6)(cid:19)(cid:1)5(cid:3)(cid:14)!(cid:3)

By this common order I shall dispose of both the aforementioned appeals as the same have arisen out of one and the same FIR.

2. The aforementioned appeals have been preferred against the judgment dated 12/13.06.2008 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Court) Hisar, whereby the accused/appellants named above were convicted of the charges framed against them.

3. The FIR in the present case came to be registered on 13.05.2006. The judgment of conviction was passed on 12/13.06.2008 by the Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Hisar. The instant appeals were filed on 11.08.2008 and 05.08.2008 and have come up for final hearing now i.e. after a period of 18 years from the date of registration of the FIR.

4. In brief, the prosecution case is that on 13.5.06 when at about 3 P.M ASI Om Parkash along with HC Nafe Singh and EHC Rajiv was going towards Sector(cid:19)16 in connection with patrol duty, he met complainant Swarup Chand S/o Rulia Ram R/o H.No. 92, Sec.(cid:19)13, Hisar, who got recorded his statement to the effect that he was a resident of above said address. On that day around 12.30 P.M, he, alongwith his wife Smt. Bhagwanti, his daughter in law and grand son Punnit were present in the house. After five minutes of his daughter in law returning to the home, after bringing his grand daughter Meenu from Vidhya Devi Jindal, School, three young men aged about 20(cid:19)21 years armed with a pistol entered the house and while aiming the pistol at him asked them to handover their belongings to them. In the meantime, his servant(cid:19)Bahadur came there. At pistol point, the accused snatched two gold bangles and gold earrings of his wife, two gold bangles and a gold ring of his daughter(cid:19)in(cid:19)law and threatened them to handover the cash. When he told that he was not possessing any cash, they pushed him and all the family members alongwith their servant in the bathroom and locked them. The accused also took away their phone make Samsung having No.