SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 92

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 20.02.2025 KULDEEP SINGH ...Appellant Versus VEENA DEVI ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Present:- Mr. S.S Swaich, Advocate for appellant Mr. Ajay Ghangas, Advocate and Ms. Mehak Ghangas, Advocate for the respondent SUDHIR SINGH, J.

Challenge in the present appeal is to the judgment and decree dated 13.10.2016 passed by the learned District Judge, (Family Court), Karnal (for short `the Family Court’), whereby the petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short `the Act’) filed by the appellant-husband was dismissed.

2. The aforesaid petition had been filed by the appellant- husband, inter-alia, pleading therein that his marriage with the respondent-wife was solemnized on 15.06.1981 as per Hindu rites and out of the said wedlock, a male child was born. It was contended that from the very beginning, the respondent-wife exhibited controlling and abusive behaviour, with her family frequently interfering in their lives. Further, the respondent-wife brother’s was having criminal background and the appellant-husband was having threats from t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top