IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

213 Date of decision: 20.02.2025 Amit Kumar ...Petitioner VERSUS Haryana Staff Selection Commission and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Kuldeep Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Tapan Kumar, DAG Haryana.

Mr. Brijender Kaushik, Advocate for respondent No.2.

*****

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)

1. Challenge in the present petition is to the result dated 19.03.2021 to the extent the petitioner had been not selected for the post of Pharmacist advertised vide Advt. No.15/2019 dated 07.09.2019 despite the petitioner having secured more marks.

2. The grievance espoused by the petitioner is that the respondent- authorities have not given him the benefit of the marks for experience despite the requisite documents having been uploaded by him in support of his claim and resultantly, the person lower in merit has been given appointment while the claim of the petitioner has been ignored.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contends that the respondent-Commission had issued an Advt. No.15/2019 dated 07.09.2019 advertising 4322 posts of various Departments/Corporations/

Boa