SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 122

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
TARSEM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent


238 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-38039-2018 Date of decision:20.02.2025 TARSEM SINGH ..Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY *****

Present : Mr. N.P.S. Mann, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vikram Jeet Singh, Advocate for the respondent No.5.

Ms. Shruti, AAG Punjab.

*****

AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)

1. The prayer made in the present petition is for quashing the order dated 20.07.2018, wherein recovery of the amount of grade pay has been ordered from the petitioner, which this Court had stayed on 21.12.2018, in view of the law laid down in the judgment in the case of State of Punjab and others Vs. Rafiq Masih etc. 2015 (4) SCC 334.

2. Petitioner who was working as Junior Assistant retired on 31.03.2012, however, on 30.03.2015 was issued a letter by the respondent- department stating that the grade pay of Rs.3000/- has been wrongly granted instead of Rs.2800/- and accordingly after two years vide letter dated 23.08.2017, respondent No.5, Executive Officer, Panchayat Samiti sought to recover Rs.83,296/- on account of wrong calculation of pay benefits. Learned counsel states there was neither any misrepre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top