SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8987

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
DHARMENDRA ALIAS DHARMINDER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

239 (cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:6)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:9)(cid:5)(cid:7) (O&M) Date of Decision:- 20.02.2025 (cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:2)(cid:5)(cid:4)(cid:1)(cid:4)(cid:9)(cid:10)(cid:4)(cid:11)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:10)(cid:8)(cid:2)(cid:7)(cid:5)

....Petitioner(s)

Versus (cid:11)(cid:12)(cid:4)(cid:12)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:13)(cid:14)(cid:1)(cid:15)(cid:16)(cid:8)(cid:17)(cid:4)(cid:18)

...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present : Mr. Barjinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ankit Grewal, DAG Punjab.

*****

SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL)

The instant petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Section 439 CrPC for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in the following case :-

FIR No. Dated Sections Police Station

163 19.08.2022 379-B, 120-B, 212, 411, City Sangrur, District

465, 467, 468, 471, 414, Sangrur

201 of IPC no. 2), Mo

2. It is, inter alia, contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He contends that the petitioner has been impli

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top