SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
AMIT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 21.02.2025 Amit ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARAMJIT SINGH Present: Mr. Vinod Ghai, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arnav Ghai, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Inderjeet Singh Ladher, DAG, Punjab.

****

KARAMJIT SINGH, J. (ORAL)

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS 2023 seeking grant of regular bail in case having FIR No.227 dated 14.07.2024, under Section 303(2), 317(2) (wrongly mentioned as 317(4) in impugned order dated 26.11.2024) 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2) of BNS 2023, Police Station Sohana, District Mohali.

2. The FIR in this case was registered against one Ramesh Kumar on the basis of the statement recorded by Amritpal wherein it was alleged that he (Amritpal) is dealing in sale and purchase of second hand cars and aforesaid Ramesh Kumar was known to him. That Ramesh Kumar handed over three cars to him for the purpose of sale and thereafter, Ramesh Kumar took away two of the said cars but third car remained with the complainant. On this, the complainant got suspicious and on inquiry came to know that Ramesh Kum

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top