SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 10938

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIJAY PAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Vijay Pal ...Appellant Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents Sr. No. Particulars Details 1 The date when the judgment is reserved 19.02.2026 2 The date when the judgment is pronounced 23.02.2026 3 The date when the judgment is uploaded on the website 23.02.2026 Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced or full

4 Full judgment is pronounced The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full judgment, and Not

5 reasons thereof applicable CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Akinchan Aggarwal, Advocate and Mr. Amit Kaushik, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Munish Behl, Advocate for respondent No. 2/complainant.

***

MANISHA BATRA, J.

1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short ‘the Act, 1989’) by the appellant against the order dated 29.10.2025 passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karnal, whereby an application filed by him under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of anticipatory bail in case

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top