SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 92

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KANTA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


203 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-28762-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 24.02.2025 Kanta Devi ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present:- Mr. Vivek Salathia, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Ambika Sood, Addl. A.G. Haryana.

Mr. Keshav Partap Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 5.

Mr. J.S. Dahiya, Advocate with Mr. Phool Kumar, Advocate for respondent No. 6.

Mr. Ravi Kamal Gupta, Advocate for CBI-respondent No. 7.

****

AMARJOT BHATTI, J.

1. Petitioner Kanta Devi filed Criminal Miscellaneous Petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) for issuance of directions to respondents No. 2 and 3 to trace the whereabouts of missing daughter of petitioner, who has been missing since 08.08.2016, as her life is in eminent danger at the hands of private respondents No. 5 and 6, who have not been associated into investigation by respondent No. 3, despite the fact his daughter was last seen in the company of said private respondents, with further prayer to issue directions to respondent No. 2 to ensure fair and impartial investigation in FIR No. 876 dated 09.08.2016 under Section 365

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top