SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9080

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIKAS HARISH ALIAS VICKY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

300 CRM-M-50778-2024 (O&M)

Date of decision: 24.02.2025 Vikas Harish @ Vicky ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present:- Mr. Dinesh Trehan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Swati Batra, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.

MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral)

1. Prayer in this petition, filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in FIR No. 103 dated 13.08.2024, registered under Sections 21(c), 25 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short ‘NDPS Act’) at Police Station Dugri, District Police Commissionerate Ludhiana.

2. Brief facts of the case relevant for the purpose of disposal of this petition are that on 13.08.2024, on the basis of a secret information, co- accused Jasjot Singh @ Jot and Khushmandar Singh @ Mander were apprehended by a police party and recovery of 21000 intoxicant tablets (Alprazolam) along with drug money of Rs. 15,050/- and an electric scooty was effected from them. During the course of investigation, on the disclosure of co-accused Jasjot Singh @ Jot, another recovery of 9000 intoxicant tablets of the same salt was effected. On the disclosure statements suffered by aforesaid co-accused, Deepak Garg and his mother Savita Garg were also nominated in this case on the allegations that they used to supply intoxicant tablets to said co-accused. Further, on the disclosure of co- accused Jasjot Singh @ Jot, one Sandeep Singh was also nominated as accused and was arrested on 13.08.2024 and recovery of 600 intoxicant tablets was effected from him. On interrogation, co-accused Deepak Garg and Sandeep Singh named one Rahul Hans, who was arrested on 14.08.2024. The disclosure statement of co-accused Rahul Hans was recorded, wherein he named the present petitioner and on the basis of the same, the present petitioner was nominated in this case as an accused. He was arrested on 15.08.2024 and on his disclosure, recovery of 4800 intoxicant tablets of Alprazolam was effected from him. After completion of necessary investigation and usual formalities, challan was presented in the Court and presently, the petitioner along with co-accused is facing trial for commission of aforesaid mentioned offences. He had moved an application for grant of regular bail before the Court of learned Judge, Special Court, Ludhiana but the same had been dismissed, vide order dated 13.09.2024.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner was not found at the spot and has been involved in this case on the basis of a series of disclosure statements suffered by co-accused, which is not admissible in evidence against the petitioner. He is not involved in any other case under the NDPS Act. Investigation has since been completed and challan has been presented. Trial is likely to take time. The petitioner is in custody since

15.08.2024. No useful purpose would be served by keeping them in custody anymore. Even otherwise, the petitioner is suffering serious ailments like acute pancreatitis, hypertension and high blood pressure. Hence, even on medical grounds, the petitioner deserves to be released on bail. It is, therefore, urged that the petition deserves to be allowed.

4. Status report has been filed by the respondent-State. It is submitted therein and learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab has argued that though the petitioner has been nominated in this case on the basis of the disclosure statement suffered by above named co-accused but during the course of investigation, his complicity in the subject crime has been duly established. Recovery of 4800 tablets of Alprazolam was effected from him, which itself falls within the commercial quantity. It is further submitted that since a commercial quantity of the contraband has been recovered in this case, the rigor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top