IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
BALJIT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:9)(cid:4)(cid:10)(cid:11)(cid:10)(cid:8) (O&M) Date of Decision:- 24.02.2025 (cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:5)(cid:9)(cid:10)(cid:11)
....Petitioner(s)
Versus (cid:8)(cid:6)(cid:2)(cid:6)(cid:12)(cid:7)(cid:13)(cid:14)(cid:7)(cid:15)(cid:16)(cid:9)(cid:4)(cid:2)(cid:1)
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present : Mr. Manjot Gujral, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Jatinder Pal Singh, Sr. DAG Punjab.
*****
SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL)
The instant petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Section 439 CrPC for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in the following case :-
FIR No. Dated Sections Police Station
144 20.08.2023 379-B IPC; City-2 Khanna, (392, 394, 398, 411, 201 and Police District Khanna, Ludhiana
34 IPC added later on)
no. 2), Mo
2. It is, inter alia, contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner is in custody since 25.08.2023 and consequent upon his arrest, recovery of an iron bangle and gol
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.