SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 11018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ABCD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 528 of BNSS with a prayer to issue directions to the Registry/Computer Branch of this Court as well as District Court Gurugram to redact the name of the petitioner from the e-courts portal, in connection with FIR No. 100 dated 10.04.2024 under Sections 384/419 of IPC and Sections 66-C and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2008 (amended) registered at Police Station Cyber Cell West, Gurugram.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is a reputed corporate professional and had been working at the highest levels in Amazon, American Express and HSBC and is having total experience spanning over 20 years in India and USA. The petitioner is a post graduate of reputed educational institutions including Jawahar Lal Nehru University and Delhi University. The petitioner was falsely involved in FIR No. 100 dated 10.04.2024 under Sections 384/419 of IPC and Sections 66-C and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2008 (amended), Police Station Cyber Cell West, Gurugram and the total amount in dispute was Rs. 3,000/-. Even, the petitioner was wrongly arrested and was remanded to judicial custody in the s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top