SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9125

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PANKAJ SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


215 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:25.02.2025 Pankaj Sharma ….Petitioner(s)

VERSUS State of Punjab ….Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Mr. Sunil Agnihotri, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Amandeep Singh DAG, Punjab.

****

SANJAY VASHISTH , J. (Oral)

1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C., for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, during the pendency of trial, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed hereunder:-

Name of FIR Date Under Police District Petitioner(s) No. Section(s) Station Pankaj 117 09.10.2023 22-61-85 of Hariana Hoshiarpur Sharma NDPS Act

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged recovery of 258 grams of intoxicant substance i.e. tramadol powder has been effected from the possession of the petitioner. Counsel submits that the recovery is only 8 gms more than the maximum of non-commercial quantity and it is a moot question whether the quantity of said contraband is in isolation or inclusive of the polythene etc. The chances of inclusion of the polythene etc. and difference in weight cannot be ruled out whi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top