237 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 25.02.2025 Ram Singh @ Kala and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Vinay Bajaj, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Nitesh Sharma, DAG, Punjab.

HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL)

1. This revision petition has been preferred against the judgment dated 11.02.2011 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Bathinda, vide which judgment of conviction and order on quantum of sentence dated 10.08.2009 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Phul, in FIR No.51 dated 18.11.2001 under Sections 342/325/323/34/324 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’), registered at Police Station Baliawali, have been upheld.

2. The petitioners were convicted by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Phul vide judgment dated 10.08.2009 and were sentenced as mentioned below:

It was ordered that all sentences shall run concurrently.

3. The petitioners preferred an appeal against judgment dated 10.08.2009 which was dismissed by learned lower Appellate Court vide judgment dated 11.02.2011.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that he is no