SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 93

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MANOHAR LAL MEHTA (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS – Appellant
Versus
KRISHNA DEVI AND OTHERS – Respondent


117 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : 25.02.2025 Manohar Lal Mehta (since deceased) through his LRs ...... Appellant versus Krishna Devi & ors. ..... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN ***

Present :- Mr. Munish Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.

***

PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)

1 Plaintiff is in second appeal aggrieved of part of judgment and decree dated 20.09.2019 passed by Additional District Judge, Hoshiarpur returned by the Lower Appellate Court allowing his suit in part to the extent that he has been entitled to 1/8th share in the suit property left by Raja Ram his father. For convenience parties hereinafter are referred to by their original position in the suit i.e. the appellant as plaintiff and the respondents as defendants.

2 Plaintiff filed a suit seeking decree of declaration to the effect that he is owner in possession of the land measuring 153 kanals 8 marlas as detailed out in the head note of the plaint. Plaintiff claimed that the suit land was purchased in the name of Raja Ram his father as Benamidar. After death of Raja Ram, the same has been wrongly mutated in favour of defendants No.1 to 4. Plaintiff being exclusive o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top