SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9166

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
M/S INSTRUMENTATION LTD – Appellant
Versus
UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI NIGAM LTD – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 25.02.2025 M/S INSTRUMENTATION LTD. ….APPLICANT Vs.

UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI NIGAM LTD. ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Ms. Dilmrig Nayani, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

****

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J (ORAL)

1. The applicant through instant application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short “1996 Act”) is seeking appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties.

2. The applicant-M/s Instrumentation Limited is a Government of India Undertaking. It is engaged in the business of manufacturing and supplying equipment on turnkey basis. The respondent is Government of Haryana Undertaking means applicant as well as respondent are Government Undertakings. The respondent floated a Tender in 2009 for supply of material for conversion of existing LT Lines to new 11 kV Lines. The applicant submitted its bid and respondent awarded the work. The applicant requested for grant of exemptions, however, respondent rejected its request on the ground that terms and conditions of the contract are sacrosanct. The respond

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top