SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 11078

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NAVEEN KUMAR AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 25.02.2025 NAVEEN KUMAR AND OTHERS ... Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ.

****

Present: Mr. Abhishek Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners.

Ms. Tanisha Peshawaria, DAG, Haryana.

****

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL)

Challenge in the present petition is to the orders dated 17.10.2020 and 19.10.2020 recommending for termination and order dated 22.10.2020 and speaking order dated 02.09.2024 vide which the services of the petitioners have been terminated.

Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that 31 sanctioned posts of Clerks/Data Entry Operator were lying vacant in the office of Deputy Commissioner, Rewari since 2007, against which, the petitioners were appointed in the year 2015, 2017 and 2018 respectively through a due process of selection. The advertisement for the same was duly issued to grant opportunity to all eligible and interested candidates to compete and a type test followed by an interview was also held. The petitioners finally joined as Data Entry Operator against the said vacant sanctioned posts, however, the appointments of the petiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top