IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (110)

CR-1181-2025 Date of decision: - 27.02.2025 Jiva Ram Goyal ....Petitioner Versus Ramesh Kumar Bansal and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Mr. Achin Gupta, Advocate, and Mr. Karan Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

****

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

1. Present civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 22.10.2024 (Annexure P-5) passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bathinda whereby the application filed by the petitioner/defendant No.2 under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the present case, the prayers made in the suit are covered under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure and thus, the suit could have only been instituted either by the Advocate General or two or more persons having an interest in the trust and after having obtained the leave of the Court. It is further submitted that the present suit has neither been instituted by the Advocate General nor the leave of the court has been taken. It is argued th