SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 11117

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MUKESH KUMAR ALIAS DHOLIA ALIAS JORA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (385)

CRM-M-10208-2025 (O & M)

Date of Decision:-27.02.2025 Mukesh Kumar @ Dholia @ Jora ......Petitioner.

Vs.

State of Haryana ......Respondent.

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present:- Mr. Vikas Bishnoi, Advocate, for the Petitioner.

Mr. Reepu Dhaman, AAG, Haryana.

***

JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.(ORAL The prayer in the present petition under Section 483 of BNSS of 2023 is for the grant of regular bail in case FIR No.4 dated 04.01.2023 under Section 15(c) of the NDPS Act, 1985 (Sections 27-A and 29 of the NDPS Act added later on) registered at Police Station Bhattu Kalan, District Fatehabad.

2. The brief facts of the case are that Mukesh Kumar @ Dholia @ Jora (petitioner) and Bhupender Singh @ Manda @ Madda (since granted the concession of bail vide order dated 28.01.2025, Annexure P-2) were apprehended with 53 kgs. of poppy husk. They disclosed that they had purchased the contraband from one Anil Kumar.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that there is a violation of the mandatory provisions of the Act regarding the search and seizure. No independent witness of recovery was joined during the course of the recovery

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top