SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 11132

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SANJEEV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-10416-2025 DECIDED ON:27.02.2025 SANJEEV .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Pinki Mehla, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. B.S. Virk, Sr. DAG, Haryana.

SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL)

1. The petitioner is seeking the intervention of this Court under Section 483(3) of BNSS for cancellation of bail of respondent no.2 granted by this Hon’ble High Court, vide its order dated 31.05.2023 (Annexure P-11) in FIR No.583, dated 14.10.2021, under Sections 120-B, 302,3017,324,449,326,201 of IPC at Police Station Pundri, District Kaithal, Haryana.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner–complainant has contended that true facts of the case have not been putforth before this court wherein it is not only a case of double murder but a clear case of recovery also. He further contends that the co-accused namely Ismile Ali @Raju had murdered Geeta and her minor daughter Smriti in a barbaric manner and also gave serious injuries to Saksham, stole two mobile phones which got recovered from respondent no.2-accused namely Darshan Singh. It is submitted by the counsel for t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top