In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh [163]

D ate of Decision: 27 .02.2025 JAGMAL SINGH JATAIN ..... PETITIONER VERSUS DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE, BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA, 21, ROUSE ENCLAVE, INDUSTRIAL AREA, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS ......RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Sandeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr. Birender Singh Rana, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Manav Dhull, Advocate, Ms. Niharika Singh, Advocate Mr. Nayandeep Rana, Advocate, Ms. Anu Chaudhary, Advocate and Ms. Rahish Pahwa, Advocate for respondent No.2.

None for respondent No.4.

****

SURESHWAR THAKUR , J. (ORAL)

1. Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, learned Senior Counsel, who had earlier appeared on behalf co-respondent No.4, was requested to seek instructions from the said co-respondent No.4, for his appearing on his behalf in the instant writ petition. However, Sh. Kanwaljit Singh, learned Senior Counsel, after having cellular communication with co-respondent No.4, apprised this Court, that he has not been instructed by the said co-respondent, thus t