SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
INDERJIT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
BALBIR SINGH – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-959-2000 (O&M)

Reserved on: 10.02.2025 Pronounced on: 27.02.2025 INDERJIT SINGH . . . .APPELLANT Vs.

BALBIR SINGH . . . . RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Amit Jain, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Parit Aggarwal, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent.

DEEPAK GUPTA, J.

Suit for possession and permanent injunction regarding property in dispute filed by plaintiff-Inderjit Singh minor (appellant herein) against defendants-Balbir Singh and others, was dismissed by the trial Court of ld. Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division) Rajpura on 22.07.1996. Appeal filed by the plaintiff against the said judgment was dismissed by the First Appellate Court of ld. Additional District Judge, Patiala vide judgment dated 15.12.1999. Against these concurrent findings, the plaintiff has approached this Court by way of the present Regular Second appeal.

2. Lower Court record was called. Same has been perused. In order to avoid confusion, parties shall be referred as per their status before the Trial Court.

3. Undisputed facts are that Sharam Singh was owner of 44 bighas 17 biswas of land situ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top