SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 207

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KRISHAN KUMAR AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
RAM PAL – Respondent


260-Urgent IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 28.02.2025 Krishan Kumar and another .......... Appellants Versus Ram Pal .......... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Mohit, Advocate for Mr. Vikrant Rana, Advocate for the appellants-defendants.

****

HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)

By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to the judgment and decree dated 11.02.2020 passed by the Court of Additional District Judge, Charkhi Dadri (hereinafter to be referred as “First Appellate Court”), whereby first appeal filed at the instance of appellants- defendants against the judgment and decree dated 19.09.2017 passed by the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Charkhi Dadri (hereinafter to be referred as “trial Court”), decreeing the suit for permanent injunction instituted at the instance of respondent-plaintiff, was dismissed; thereby restraining the appellants-defendants from interfering in the use and enjoyment of tubewell in question.

[2] Briefly stating, respondent-plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction, while claiming himself to be in joint possession with appellants- defendants over the land measuring 105 kanal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top