IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MOHIT @ MOHIT DALAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 17.02.2025 Pronounced on: 28.02.2025 Mohit @ Mohit Dalal ...Pe(cid:14)(cid:14)oner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Ajay Ghangas, Advocate, For the pe(cid:14)(cid:14)oner.
Mr. Aashish Bishnoi, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Chanderhas Yadav, Advocate, for the complainant.
****
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
FIR No. Dated Police Sta0on Sec0ons
378 11.12.2024 Badli, Bahadurgarh, 190, 193(3), 115, 126, 287, 351(3), Dis1. Jhajjar 110, 117(2) of BNS and Sec(cid:14)ons (Haryana) 25/54/59 of Arms Act
1. The pe(cid:14)(cid:14)oner apprehending arrest in the FIR cap(cid:14)oned above has come up before this Court under Sec(cid:14)on 482 of Bhara(cid:14)ya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking an(cid:14)cipatory bail.
2. In paragraph 12 of the bail pe(cid:14)(cid:14)on, the accused declares that he has no criminal antecedents.
3. The facts of the case are being taken from translated copy of FIR annexed with bail pe(cid:14)(cid:14)on as Annexure P-1, which reads as follows:
“To SHO sahab, Police Sta(cid:19)on Badli. Sir, I request that I Devendra S/o Ramesh, is resident of village Jakhoda, dist
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.