IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 03.03.2025 HARJINDER SINGH AND ORS .... Petitioners VERSUS GURPREET SINGH AND ORS .... Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present : Mr. Gagandeep Singh Virk, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate for respondent No.1.

ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)

1. The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 22.07.2022 (Annexure P-1) which reads as under :

‘Case is fixed for plaintiff’s evidence.

No PW is present. Perusal of the file shows that the present case is more than 5 years old case and issues in the present case were framed on 14.03.2017 and till date the case is pending for plaintiff’s evidence. Plaintiff has already availed sufficient opportunities till date for concluding his entire evidence, but he has failed to do so. Infact, plaintiff has not even examined a single witness despite the fact that 5 years have passed since the case was fixed for plaintiff’s evidence.

There is no justification for adjourning the case for plaintiff evidence. Accordingly, evidence on behalf of plaintiff stands closed by court ord