IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SHALLU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 03.03.2025 SHALLU ….PETITIONER Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ....RESPONDENT CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present:- Mr. Rahul Soi, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Ankit Grewal, DAG, Punjab.
****
SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL)
By way of present petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR (Annexure P-1) as under:
FIR No. Dated Sections Police Station
113 08.09.2024 329 (4), 331(6), 324 (4), Kotwali Bathinda, 351(2), 191 (3), 190 and Bathinda.
331(7) of BNS.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance to the order dated 16.01.2025 passed by this Court, the petitioner has already joined the investigation and as such prayed for confirming the interim bail granted vide order dated 16.01.2025.
3. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Baljeet Singh, intimates the Court that the petitioner has joined investigation and is neither required for further investigation nor for any custodial interrogation.
4. During the course of hearing on 16.01.2025, following order was passed:
“Heard.
2. Status report filed by the State also perused.
3. Admittedly, the petitio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.