SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 9710

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUNIL KUMAR AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

304 CRM-M No.60979-2024 Date of Decision: 03.03.2025 Sunil Kumar & others .....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab & another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present: Mr. Manbir Singh Batth, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. J.S.Arora, DAG, Punjab.

Mr.J.S.Johal, Advocate, for Mr.Sauman Singh Gill, Advocate for respondent No.2.

****

RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)

1. Instant petition has been filed seeking quashing of FIR No.0182 dated 07.08.2020, under Sections 323, 324, 325, 148, 149 of IPC (offence under Section 326 added vide rapat No.20 dated 12.08.2020), registered at Police Station Sri Hargobindpur, Police District Batala (Annexure P-1) along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise deed dated 20.11.2024 (Annexure P-2).

2. FIR in question was got registered by complainant-respondent No.2 and the investigation commenced thereon. However, with the intervention of respectables, finally the parties arrived at settlement and they resolved their inter se dispute, which is apparent from Compromise Deed, annexed as Annexure P-2. On the basis of the compromise, petitioners are invo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top