SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 40

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


282 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 04.03.2025 JARNAIL SINGH …Petitioner V/S U.T. CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. H.R. Bhardwaj, Advocate and Mr. Suraj Kaundal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Shashank Bhandari, Addl. PP UT Chandigarh for Mr. Amit Kumar Goyal, Addl. PP UT Chandigarh.

Mr. Amit Singh Barnala, Advocate for respondent No. 2.

****

HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral)

1. The present revision petition is preferred against the judgment dated 26.07.2008 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chandigarh vide which judgment of conviction and order on quantum of sentence dated 23.08.2006 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Chandigarh have been upheld, whereby, petitioner has been convicted and sentenced as under:

Offence under Section Sentence Fine Sentence in default of payment of fine
494 of Indian Penal Code Rigorous imprisonment for one year Rs. 1,000/- Rigorous imprisonment for one month

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that he is not assail-

ing the impugned judgment of conviction dated 26.07.2008 passed by learned Additional Sessions

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top