SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 38

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
USHA RANI AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
AMRIK SINGH AND ORS. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 04.03.2025 USHA RANI AND ORS. ......Appellant(s)

Vs.

AMRIK SINGH AND ORS. ......Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Namit Khurana, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.3-Insurance Company.

****

SUDEEPTI SHARMA J.

1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 15.12.2005 passed in the claim petition bearing MACT No. 68 of 2004 filed under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri (for short, 'the Tribunal') for enhancement of compensation granted to the claimants/appellants on account of death of Pyare Lal who died in a motor vehicular accident, occurred on 14.07.2004, whereby, the claimants/appellants were granted compensation to the tune of Rs.2,80,200/- alongwith interest @ 7.5% per annum.

2. As sole issue for determination in the present appeal is confined to quantum of compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal, a detailed narration of the facts of the case are not reproduced for the sake of brevity.

SUBMISSION

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top