SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 24

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
GURDAS RAM EC. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB.ETC. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

201 Date of decision: 05.03.2025 Gurdas Ram and others ...Petitioners VERSUS State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Harkirat Singh, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Balwinder Singh, AAG Punjab.

*****

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)

Challenge in the present petition is to the order dated

29.07.1999 whereby pay-scale of the petitioners has been reduced from Rs.810-1440/- to Rs. 770-1350/-.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners contends that the petitioners were working as ‘Beldars’ since 1980 at Ranjit Sagar Dam, Shahpurkandi, the then Tehsil Pathankot, District Gurdaspur. The petitioners were paid the pay-scale, as applicable to the Beldars. He submits that due to certain anomalies in the pay-scales, the 3rd Pay Commission recommended rationalization of the posts and fresh pay-scales were recommended. Vide communication No.14222-24/6RSDA/96 dated 14.05.1996 (Annexure P-2) the pay-scales of Rs.810-1440/- was given to the petitioners by the Chief Engineer/RSDC, Irrigation Works, Punjab. The operative part thereof reads thus:-

“xxxx

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top