SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 48

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ANOOP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 06.03.2025 ANOOP SINGH ALIAS SONU ...Appellant Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Gursahib Singh Hundal, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Rishabh Singla, AAG, Punjab.

***

Harpreet Singh Brar, J. (Oral)

1. Present appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 23.02.2006 passed by learned Judge, Special Court, Amritsar vide which the appellant has been convicted under Section 21 of NDPS Act and sentenced as mentioned below:

Offence under Section Sentence Fine Sentence in default of payment of fine
21 of NDPS Act Rigorous imprisonment for six months Rs. 200/- Rigorous imprisonment for 15 days

2. Learned counsel for the appellant inter alia contends that there is non-compliance of Section 50 of the NDPS Act. Further, the representative sample was sent after a delay of 9 days and no offer under the provisions of Section 50 of the NDPS Act was made. No independent witness had joined and the case of the prosecution solely rests on official witnesses. He furthe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top