SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 11508

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ANUP KUMAR AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-3818-2025 Date of Decision: 06.03.2025 Anup Kumar and another ......Petitioner(s)

Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. R.S. Dhull, Advocate (appearing through video conferencing)

and Mr. Navnit Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)

1. The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India are seeking direction to respondent to issue them appointment letter.

2. The petitioners, pursuant to advertisement No.6/2024 dated 28.06.2024, applied for the post of Constable. They participated in the Common Eligibility Test as well as final test. They came to be selected. The respondent conducted verification of their credentials and found that FIR(s) were pending against them at the time of filing application forms. Thus, their candidature came to be rejected.

3. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana, during the course of hearing, produced application forms of both the petitioners. There is specific column in the application forms with respect to FIR. The petitioners

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top